The cost of the Trans Mountain pipeline has risen again

Expect the latest cost estimate Much less expensive projectvalued at $12.6 billion.

In a press release, the company justifies the increase by about $9 billion from the fallout from the pandemic and floods in British Columbia. Forced natural disaster Temporary disruption of the main pipeline.

The Alberta government said the gap was understandable given the conditions caused by the flooding. It is also mentioned that the company provided equipment and labor to help the affected population in the affected areas.

Originally, the project was to cost $7.4 billion. It is now three times more expensive.

The service date for the expanded pipeline has also been pushed back by nearly a year. The company has so far stated that the pipeline will be usable in December 2022. Final construction work is now scheduled for the third quarter of 2023.

Despite these delays and cost increases, Ian Anderson, President and CEO of Trans Mountain, asserts that the project will be profitable for Canada.

According to former TC Energy Vice President Dennis McConaughey, it is It is imperative that this project be completed.

Even with rising construction costs and their impact on the rate at which oil is transported from Edmonton to Burnaby, British Columbia, this pipeline is essential because it will increase oil sands production.

The Trans Mountain project aims to triple the capacity of the existing pipeline, increasing it from 300,000 to 890,000 barrels of oil per day.

Kinder Morgan transmission pipeline route

Photo: Radio Canada

The federal government will not inject public funds to absorb these new costs

Federal Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland says this cost increase will not be paid by the taxpayer, but by a third party, such as a financial institution.

See also  Female entrepreneurship: 110 companies on the list

The government has retained BMO Capital Markets and TD Securities to advise on the financial aspects of the project. Their analysis confirms that public financing of the project is a feasible option that can be implemented quickly.as stated in the press release.

« Given that 50% of the pipeline has already been built and the risks associated with the project are reduced, the government will not spend additional public funds on the project. »

Quote from Canadian government press release

Dennis McConaughey sees the decision of the Federal Secretary of the Treasury to be wise. He believes this will provide Canadian taxpayers with a significant return on investment when sold.

The federal government intends to initiate the process of divestment once the risks associated with the expansion project have diminished and economic engagement with indigenous groups has advanced.Federalism concludes.

However, the British Columbia Green Party leader argues that the federal government should have invested in green energy.

It is incredible that in 2022, millions of dollars are still being invested in the fossil fuel sector; I do not understandThis is Sonia Furstenau.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.